What Do We Know about Hell? Bell and His Critics
Tuesday, 3 May 2011
| David Powys
There are reports of clashes in cyberspace somewhere over North America between senior pastors of some of that country’s largest mega-churches.
Pastor Rob Bell of Mars Hill Fellowship Michigan, known in Australia for the Nooma video series, has raised widespread ire by asking “would a loving God send people to eternal torment for ever?” He did so in a small book published in the US late last month, but still not available in Australia - Love Wins.
Such was the sensitivity and tension that the controversy raged even before the book’s publication. Bell was quickly condemned as a universalist, not least by Mark Driscoll of a Mars Hill in another part of America - Seattle! Bell’s orthodoxy was disputed. His fall as an Evangelical star was proclaimed by John Piper of Bethlehem Baptist Church in a three word tweet, "Farewell Rob Bell.”
The tone of many of the early responses was not sadness, but vindication, as though the true colours of a dangerous young rival had been exposed. Subsequent responses have been more measured, recognizing strengths as well as vulnerabilities in Bell’s publication. The best have come from Evangelicals in the United Kingdom who have done much more careful work in this area, not least under the influence of the late Dr John Wenham.
Certainty and a need to maintain certainty about things that are not certain seems to be at the core of this furore. Bell is certain that hell exists, but he is not certain that it will be populated for ever. The responses have come from people also certain that hell exists, but adamant that it will be populated for ever, because, they argue, of God’s holiness and justice, or to put this another way, because of the gravity of the atoning work of Christ on the cross.
The debate is between people who claim to be thoroughly biblical, and who are conversant with the few biblical texts about hell, but who have not managed to penetrate deeper than proof texts. There has been little recognition of the role and audience of the ‘hell texts’ in the New Testament. Both sides treat as certainties things that are in fact uncertain or are but faint themes in Scripture. In their certainty they have been governed by their starting presuppositions rather than by anything consistently or positively affirmed in the Bible.
One of these certainties is the ‘child’ of the other certainty. The ‘parent’ certainty is that every human is naturally immortal, does not and indeed cannot really die, and thus has to be unendingly accommodated by God after their bodies fail.
Mark Driscoll, in To Hell with Hell (http://theresurgence.com/2011/03/14/to-hell-with-hell), responding to this latest denial of “the classic Christian belief of a literal hell with eternal conscious suffering”, sets out to “simply be honest and say what the Bible says …”. He embarks on this by responding to this own question ‘What happens when we die?’, to which he answers “God created humans as thinking, feeling, moral persons made up of spirit and body tightly joined together. … Death is the tearing apart of these two intertwined parts … The body goes to the grave and the spirit goes into an afterlife to face judgment. The Bible is clear that there will one day be a bodily resurrection for everyone to either eternal life with God or eternal condemnation apart from him in hell.”
I have made a life-long study of these very matters and can vouch that the Bible, read with eyes not clouded by the unhebraic notion of innate immortality, does not ‘say’ many of these things at all. It does not ‘say’ that we are “persons made up of spirit and body tightly joined together”, nor that “Death is the tearing apart of these two intertwined parts”, nor that at death “The body goes to the grave and the spirit goes into an afterlife to face judgment.”
There are biblical texts, all dealing with topics quite different to ‘What happens when we die’, which can be enlisted through uncertain inference to support this view. But the texts which directly address this question (ie John 6:35-51; John 11:17-27; Romans 8:18-25; 1 Cor 15:17-26, 35-57; 2 Cor 4:13 - 5:10; 1 Thess 4:13-18; 2 Thess 1:6-10; Rev 20:11 – 21:6) support no such view. These passages speak of death as real not illusory, of the resurrection of all at the return of Christ, of the subsequent judgment of all, and of this having two possible outcomes – fullness of life in a restored creation or destruction. None of these texts would reflect the so-called “classic Christian belief of a literal hell with eternal conscious suffering”.
But when the Bible is put to one side, and the starting point is the ‘parent certainty’ of natural human immortality, to the degree that it is evident that many humans end their lives not reconciled to God, ‘hell’ becomes the logical corollary, the ‘child certainty’. Both sides of the furore are agreed on these two certainties: innate immortality and hell. But they then divide.
What Bell has dared to do is question the certainty, not of innate immortality or of the existence of hell, but that hell will be eternally occupied. He has asked the question, asked quite often down the years of Christian history by those who share his certainties about natural human immortality and hell, whether people may not repent after death. It is a natural question for those who regard death as illusory not real. It is not a natural question for those who understand death as real, and so understand death to preclude post-mortem repentance.
The Biblical evidence is pretty clear – we have no warrant to expect post-mortem opportunities for repentance. Such a notion is completely inconsonant with what was arguably the main thrust of Jesus’ teaching ministry – the call to enter his kingdom before the opportunity was passed. It would be deeply problematic to suggest that somehow Jesus had not taken into account a possibility of repentance after death!
This has been a disturbing furore, not least because it reveals deep fears, fragilities and inadequacy amongst some world-revered Evangelical leaders.
Bell has no warrant for answering his question about the numbers eventually in hell with any certainty, but he is right to entertain the question. He and all others must then leave the answer to the one who knows the numbers and will be judge of all (Luke 13: 22-30), and in the meantime do all possible to boost the numbers to be welcomed because their names are in the Lamb’s Book of Life.
David Powys has a Doctor of Theology Degree from the Australian College of Theology for a dissertation ‘The Hermeneutics of Hell’ The Fate of the Unrighteous in New Testament Thought. He is the author of ‘Hell’: A Hard Look at a Hard Question, Paternoster, 1997. He is an Anglican Minister who has been in parish ministry in Melbourne for 30 years.